Writing sample · letter of inquiry

Sixth Street Clinic to The Colorado Health Foundation

Two pages asking whether the Foundation would welcome an application for $74,985, to put a peer recovery specialist on the overnight shift that the clinic currently cannot cover.

Length
2 pages
Ask
$74,985
Period
12 months
Self-grade
22 / 25
Lowest dimension
3 / 5
What this is, and what it is not

A writing sample. Not a won grant, not a client document, not a submitted application, and the applicant is written rather than real. Sixth Street Clinic, its staff, its partner hospital, its evaluator and every figure attributed to it were built for this sample. The internal numbers are invented but internally consistent, and the arithmetic is meant to be checked. The funder is real and its published priorities are quoted, so the fit logic can be checked rather than trusted.

The funder is real. The Colorado Health Foundation is an actual Denver-based health foundation. Its funding priorities are quoted from its published guidelines as of July 2026 so a reader can verify the fit logic instead of taking our word for it. Guidelines change. Anyone using this as a model should confirm current priorities, ranges and intake process before writing a live letter.

External statistics are illustrative. In client work, every community statistic is traced to a live, dated, named source before it ships. The county figures below are constructed to show what that sourcing looks like inside the sentence.

1The letter, in full

Sixth Street Clinic
418 West 6th Street, Pueblo, CO 81003
24 July 2026
Program Officer, Maintain Healthy Bodies and Minds
The Colorado Health Foundation
Denver, Colorado
Re: Inquiry ahead of application. Second Door overdose outreach, Pueblo County. $74,985

Dear Program Officer,

Sixth Street Clinic runs the only 7-day overdose outreach program in Pueblo County. I am writing to ask whether the Foundation would welcome an application for $74,985 to put a peer recovery specialist on the overnight and weekend shift, which is the shift we currently cannot cover.

Pueblo County recorded 64 overdose deaths in 2025, a rate of 37.9 per 100,000 residents, the highest of Colorado's ten most populous counties (Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Vital Statistics Program, provisional 2025 data, released April 2026). That is the condition. I will leave the rest of the county's health picture to other letters.

Our own record is narrower and more useful to you. When someone survives an opioid overdose in the emergency department at St. Isidore Regional Medical Center, a Sixth Street peer recovery specialist meets them at the bedside within 30 minutes, seven days a week, from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. A clinician starts buprenorphine before the patient leaves. The peer then stays with that person for 90 days: a call at 24 hours, another at 72 hours, then weekly for twelve weeks, with a standing Tuesday and Thursday walk-in slot held open at the clinic. In FY2025 we enrolled 214 adults this way. 168 of them, 79%, started buprenorphine within 72 hours of the overdose. 129, 60%, were still in medication treatment at 90 days. All-in cost was $2,855 per participant, from last year's actuals.

Between 11 p.m. and 7 a.m., and after 11 p.m. on weekends, nobody comes. The emergency department calls, the phone rings at an empty desk, and the patient is discharged with a pamphlet. Between July 2025 and June 2026 that happened to 41 people who met every criterion for the program. We later reached 18 of them. We never reached the other 23.

This request funds one 1.0 FTE peer recovery specialist for the Friday, Saturday and Sunday overnight shifts, plus that peer's fringe, mileage, supervision, an encrypted phone, and buprenorphine for uninsured participants. The lines add to $74,985, which is why the ask is $74,985 and not $75,000. We expect the position to reach 60 additional adults in the grant year. That is below our current rate of 89 participants per peer FTE, because overnight shifts carry fewer presentations per hour than daytime ones, and I would rather tell you the lower number now.

We read the Foundation's priority "Maintain Healthy Bodies and Minds" as covering exactly this work. Your cornerstone commitment to serving Coloradans with low income covers the people we see. Of last year's 214 participants, 143 were uninsured at intake, 67%. Pueblo County's median household income runs well below the state's.

Sixth Street Clinic has operated in Pueblo since 2004 and is a $4.18 million organization with 31 full-time staff and 44 volunteer clinicians. Our FY2025 financial statements carry a clean opinion, and our FY2025 Single Audit, required because federal awards exceeded $750,000, found no findings and no material weaknesses.

I should be direct about the timing. Second Door has been paid for since March 2023 by a State Opioid Response subaward through the Colorado Behavioral Health Administration. That subaward ends 30 September 2026 and we do not expect it back at the same level. This request is a bridge, not a rescue. The clinic already pays for the program manager, the prescriber, the clinic space and the evaluation contract out of other revenue. Colorado Medicaid reimburses peer support services. Our finance director's estimate is that Medicaid would eventually recover about $24,500 of this position's $55,676 salary and fringe. It would not recover all of it. I am not going to tell you the program becomes self-funding, because it does not.

If this fits your priorities, I would be glad to submit a full application with the emergency department MOU, the evaluator's letter of commitment, and the position description attached. If it does not fit, I would rather know that now and stop taking your time. Either answer is useful to me.

Thank you for reading.

Sincerely,

Denise Archuleta Executive Director, Sixth Street Clinic
darchuleta@example.org

Denise Archuleta and Sixth Street Clinic are written for this sample and do not exist. The email address is a reserved example domain.

The lines add to $74,985, which is why the ask is $74,985 and not $75,000. Paragraph five · a non-round ask is a cheap, unfakeable signal that someone added the column

2Claims table

Every specific claim in the letter, and where it would come from in a real engagement. In client work this table is built before the first sentence is written, and a claim with no line in it does not get written.

Sample 5. Source classes are the artifact a figure is traced to. Here the internal artifacts are invented along with the applicant.
ClaimSource class
Founded 2004; Pueblo; $4.18M budget; 31 FTE; 44 volunteer cliniciansClient fact file, org profile
Clean FY2025 opinion; FY2025 Single Audit, no findings, no material weaknessesAudited financial statements and Single Audit report, attached in live work
64 overdose deaths, 37.9 per 100,000, 2025, highest of ten most populous countiesCDPHE Vital Statistics, provisional 2025, released April 2026. Illustrative here
Program model: 30-minute ED response, 7 days, 7 a.m. to 11 p.m.; buprenorphine before discharge; 24h, 72h then weekly for 12 weeks; Tuesday and Thursday walk-in slotsClient fact file, program description
214 enrolled FY2025; 168 (79%) inducted within 72 hours; 129 (60%) retained at 90 daysClient outcome data, athenaOne and the evaluator's REDCap project
$2,855 per participant, FY2025 actualFY2025 program cost $611,000 divided by 214 participants
41 unreached, 18 later reached, 23 never reached, July 2025 to June 2026Program manager's shift log
143 of 214 (67%) uninsured at intakeClient intake data
89 participants per peer FTE214 participants divided by 2.4 peer FTE
Ask of $74,985; lines detailed in the full proposalGrant budget worksheet
SOR subaward via Colorado BHA, ends 30 September 2026Client award documents
Medicaid recovery estimate of about $24,500 against $55,676Finance director's projection from FY2025 peer billing actuals
"Maintain Healthy Bodies and Minds"; cornerstone on Coloradans with low incomeThe Colorado Health Foundation published funding priorities, July 2026

3Writer's note: what this letter is doing, and why

Written against the scoring patterns published in 17 real FY2026 federal notices of funding opportunity. Foundations do not publish rubrics; federal agencies do, and the same reviewer instincts show up in both.

The need paragraph is three sentences.

Across the 14 scored FY2026 competitions analysed, need is the smallest scored category: a median 11.25% of available points, against a median 36.4% for approach. One notice, OVC-2026-172620, prices it at "1. Description of the Need (5%)". Two notices award it nothing at all. Most letters spend their best paragraphs on the problem. That is a misallocation, and it is the single most common structural error in the genre.

One community condition, not four.

ACF's Native Language notice awards points for a narrative that "Describes only one current community condition." Restraint is not a style preference in these rubrics. It is scored. So the letter names the overdose death rate and explicitly declines to name anything else.

One statistic outside, one signal inside.

The county death rate is the external number. The 41 people nobody reached is the internal one. A need paragraph with only external data describes a county. A need paragraph with the organization's own door in it describes this applicant.

The ask is not round.

$74,985 is what the lines add to. The automatic hold for "budget lines that do not sum to the request" exists because program officers check the arithmetic before they check the prose. A non-round ask is a small, cheap, unfakeable signal that someone added the column.

The target is set below prior performance, in the open.

60 participants against a demonstrated 89 per peer FTE, with the reason stated. Targets that outrun an organization's own history read as inflation. Targets set below it, with a reason, read as someone who has run the program.

Sustainability declines to lie.

"I am not going to tell you the program becomes self-funding, because it does not." Program officers have read ten thousand sustainability sections promising otherwise.

The close offers an out.

"If it does not fit, I would rather know that now." A funder who can say no easily is a funder who will read the next letter.